<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UnUnFahrenheit 9/11</title>
	<link>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/</link>
	<description>se wo were fi na wosan kofa a yenki</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Godesky</title>
		<link>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-20647</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Godesky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-20647</guid>
		<description>Oh, perhaps you didn't "diddo" yourself.  It seems your IP comes from &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral_Roberts_University" rel="nofollow"&gt;Oral Roberts University&lt;/a&gt;, and I know how schools are with IP addresses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, perhaps you didn&#8217;t &#8220;diddo&#8221; yourself.  It seems your IP comes from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral_Roberts_University" rel="nofollow">Oral Roberts University</a>, and I know how schools are with IP addresses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Godesky</title>
		<link>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-20646</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Godesky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-20646</guid>
		<description>It'd be easier if Hitchens ever sobered up enough to make a point to refute.  He doesn't; he sticks to innuendo and baseless, useless &lt;em&gt;argumentum ad hominem&lt;/em&gt;.  I'm not a particular fan of Moore's, but I find his detractors even more loathsome.

&lt;img src="http://www.hellblazer.com/archives/hitchens-unleashed.gif" /&gt;

P.S. -- I went to the liberty of deleting your "diddo" of yourself, since I'm sure you did not intend to decieve others through such sock-puppetry, though I believe the word you were looking for is "ditto," meaning, "the same as stated above or before," from the Latin &lt;em&gt;dictus&lt;/em&gt;, "having been said," which becomes &lt;em&gt;detto&lt;/em&gt; in Italian, or &lt;em&gt;ditto&lt;/em&gt; in the Tuscan dialect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be easier if Hitchens ever sobered up enough to make a point to refute.  He doesn&#8217;t; he sticks to innuendo and baseless, useless <em>argumentum ad hominem</em>.  I&#8217;m not a particular fan of Moore&#8217;s, but I find his detractors even more loathsome.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.hellblazer.com/archives/hitchens-unleashed.gif" /></p>
<p>P.S. &#8212; I went to the liberty of deleting your &#8220;diddo&#8221; of yourself, since I&#8217;m sure you did not intend to decieve others through such sock-puppetry, though I believe the word you were looking for is &#8220;ditto,&#8221; meaning, &#8220;the same as stated above or before,&#8221; from the Latin <em>dictus</em>, &#8220;having been said,&#8221; which becomes <em>detto</em> in Italian, or <em>ditto</em> in the Tuscan dialect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wow...</title>
		<link>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-20644</link>
		<dc:creator>wow...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-20644</guid>
		<description>Not once in this incoherent cookie-dough ball argument did you:

1.Trounce any counter-point Hitchens made.

2.Correctly assert Moore's position. 

Way to inflate and subsequently deflate the dried-up, sagging hopes of the pseudo-intellectual leftist army of anti-Bush Clingon warriors that desperately troll the internet underworld  searching desperately for another illogical mechanism to squelch out any bit of truth CNN or NBC may have let slip. 

P.S. In case you were wondering, Hitchens would obliterate you.  You don't even merit an attempt at debunking him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not once in this incoherent cookie-dough ball argument did you:</p>
<p>1.Trounce any counter-point Hitchens made.</p>
<p>2.Correctly assert Moore&#8217;s position. </p>
<p>Way to inflate and subsequently deflate the dried-up, sagging hopes of the pseudo-intellectual leftist army of anti-Bush Clingon warriors that desperately troll the internet underworld  searching desperately for another illogical mechanism to squelch out any bit of truth CNN or NBC may have let slip. </p>
<p>P.S. In case you were wondering, Hitchens would obliterate you.  You don&#8217;t even merit an attempt at debunking him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Myth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Person of the Year 2005, Part II</title>
		<link>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-3780</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Myth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Person of the Year 2005, Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-3780</guid>
		<description>[...] This next fellow is one of those sick, twisted freaks from al Qaida. I mean, Abu is definitely getting a Christmas card from Satan this year. For those of you averse to reading that black and white thing with all the words, all you need to know is that Zarqawi is basically like America's Lex Luthor. Except not really. Bin Laden would probably be more akin to Luthor. And Ayman al-Zawahiri would of course be Brainiac. So I guess that would make Zarqawi more like America's Mongul...or something. Anyway, as the face of the insurgency in Iraq, Zarqawi has pretty much been the guy to get for the past year, because you know they've given up on finding bin Laden. In September, Zarqawi declared war on Shia Muslims in Iraq, an occurrence that was completely unpredictable. He is also the mastermind behind the November bombings of three hotels in Jordan, which killed 60 people. So he has definitely influenced the events of 2005 for the worse. But then, I've been engineering iniquity all year, and where am I on this list? Being an agent of Hell is such a thankless job. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This next fellow is one of those sick, twisted freaks from al Qaida. I mean, Abu is definitely getting a Christmas card from Satan this year. For those of you averse to reading that black and white thing with all the words, all you need to know is that Zarqawi is basically like America&#8217;s Lex Luthor. Except not really. Bin Laden would probably be more akin to Luthor. And Ayman al-Zawahiri would of course be Brainiac. So I guess that would make Zarqawi more like America&#8217;s Mongul&#8230;or something. Anyway, as the face of the insurgency in Iraq, Zarqawi has pretty much been the guy to get for the past year, because you know they&#8217;ve given up on finding bin Laden. In September, Zarqawi declared war on Shia Muslims in Iraq, an occurrence that was completely unpredictable. He is also the mastermind behind the November bombings of three hotels in Jordan, which killed 60 people. So he has definitely influenced the events of 2005 for the worse. But then, I&#8217;ve been engineering iniquity all year, and where am I on this list? Being an agent of Hell is such a thankless job. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Care to expand on that? Why comment if you're just going to disparage the article... at least provide SOME sort of explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Care to expand on that? Why comment if you&#8217;re just going to disparage the article&#8230; at least provide SOME sort of explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anthropik.com/2004/06/ununfahrenheit-911/#comment-517</guid>
		<description>What a load of rubbish and waste of space this article is. Why bother writing it and why waste my time reading it. It is jibberish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load of rubbish and waste of space this article is. Why bother writing it and why waste my time reading it. It is jibberish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
