Trouble in Paradise

by Mike Godesky

Bad news for the Bush-Cheney campaign came this week in the form of, surprisingly enough, Christian Coalition founder Pat Robertson. In an interview with CNN’s Paula Zahn, Robertson said of a meeting with Mr. Bush, “I met with him down in Nashville before the Gulf War started. And he was the most self-assured man I ever met in my life. You remember, Mark Twain said, he looks like a contended Christian with four aces. He was just sitting there, like, I’m on top of the world, and I warned him about this war. I had deep misgivings about this war, deep misgivings. And I was trying to say, Mr. President, you better prepare the American people for casualties. Oh, no, we’re not going to have any casualties. Well, I said, it’s the way it’s going to be. And so, it was messy. The lord told me it was going to be, A, a disaster and, B, messy. And before that, I had deep, in my spirit, I had deep misgivings about going into Iraq.” As if on instinct, the White House immediately went into attack mode. Senior campaign bitch advisor Karen Hughes was the first to respond to Robertson’s comments on CNN’s Inside Politics. “Judy, I cannot imagine that that conversation would ever take place,” Hughes said. “I’ve never heard the president say anything of the sort. Of course he knows that wars result, unfortunately, in the loss of lives. That’s one of the reasons it makes it such a difficult and agonizing decision for a president to decide to commit troops. And of course, at the time that conversation took place, we had already lost casualties in Afghanistan, in the war against terror. So I just can’t imagine what — whether he misunderstood, or what happened. But I’m certain that the president did not say that remark.” White House fall man press secretary Scott McClellan later added to that by saying, “Of course, the president never made such a comment.” Nobody in the Bush campaign came out and called Robertson a liar. But they came startlingly close. The implication here is clear. Either Robertson is lying, or he just has no idea what he’s talking about.

After a four year love affair with the Christian right, it is surprising that the Bush administration should now be in the position of accusing one of Christian conservatives’ gods of not telling the truth. Even moreso considering that Robertson is still fully supporting Bush. In the same interview he said, “I just said, I think God’s blessing him, and I think it’s one of those things that, even if he stumbles and messes up — and he’s had his share of goofs and gaffes — I just think God’s blessing is on him. And you remember, I think the Chinese used to say, you know, it’s the blessing of heaven on the emperor. And I think the blessing of heaven is on Bush. It’s just the way it is.” Regardless of the wisdom of comparing the guy you’re rooting for to a Chinese emperor, that’s still a pretty positive opinion. Yet the Bush campaign seems so comfortable with negativity that they simply cannot help attacking people, even when it’s one of their own.

One has to wonder if somebody on Bush’s staff had the brains to pull him aside and tell him it might be a bad idea to start fighting with the Christian Coalition less than two weeks before the election. Especially when, of the two major candidates in the race, it’s the Republican who doesn’t attend church. Yes, this is the same man who when asked by Bob Woodward if he asked his father for advice on Iraq replied, “There’s a higher Father that I appeal to.” The same president who began his term amidst controversy about his faith-based initiative which would “allow religious groups to compete for federal grants to provide social services.”

This is not to say that one must attend church regularly to be a good Christian. But after Republicans have made so much out of the importance of being part of a religious community, one must wonder if they would still be supporting Bush if they knew that he is not a part of one. And in fact, there are other stronger grounds on which one can question Bush’s faith. The United States has a long history of Christian presidents. Chief among these is former President Jimmy Carter. Carter is possibly the most faithful president in recent history. Since leaving office he has spent much of his time working on human rights and charity projects. And in his entire career he has never talked about God with the frequency and the aggressiveness with which Bush does. One almost has to wonder who Bush is trying to convince.

At the age of 40, Bush was what psychologist Oliver James calls an “alcoholic.” Certainly his abuse of alcohol has been well documented. Bush was even convicted of drunk driving in Kennebunkport, Maine in 1976. But that all changed in 1986. According to the Washington Post, “That July day, Bush officially swore off alcohol. But his decision was about more than getting sober. Stirred in part by what he describes as an intense, reawakening Christian faith, Bush sought to seize control of his life. By doing so he would finally begin to close the gap between what was expected of him and what he had achieved.” This was a year after his life-changing meeting with Billy Graham in Kennebunkport, the place of his DUI 9 years earlier. The Washington Post article continues, “In the end, Bush said, the key to giving up alcohol was the new spirituality he had begun to embrace the year before. Bush is not a particularly introspective man, but whatever soul-searching there was to do, he had started doing in the summer of 1985, after a conversation at the family summer retreat in Kennebunkport with the Rev. Billy Graham, a longtime family friend and spiritual adviser.

“Graham, he said, ‘planted a seed in my heart and I began to change.’”

We can think of Bush then as a so-call “born-again Christian,” with his faith being the key to his controlling his alcohol abuse. Typically, the complaint about born-again Christians is that they talk about their faith too much. This is likely because born-agains are not brought up with this devotion to God. Rather, they “find Jesus” later on in their lives. Without being brought up with their faith, born-agains need to continuously talk about it as a means of convincing themselves that they really do believe.

With Bush the need to believe is doubly important because his faith is so crucial to controlling his alcohol abuse. It provides his life with structure and discipline. His talk of God appears to have more to do with shielding himself from his own alcohol abuse than any real devotion to religion. So ironically, the president who talks the most about religion may have the most hollow faith of any president in recent memory.

Categories: Articles

Tags: , ,

Tags

Add a Tag



Comments

  1. PAT’S BACK - WITH A VENGEANCE

    Courtesy of my morning Metro mini-mag:

    If Robertson’s media blitz went too far…
    by Robin E. Cook

    Pat Robertson held a press conference following his comment that the United States should “take out” Hugo Chavez. “I’ve completely been misunderstood,” he snapped. “People ask how a man of God can say such things. Well, does being a man of God make me a wimp? I’m as much of a fighter as our commander-in-chief!
    “Christianity needs an image makeover,” Robertson continued. “No more of that simpering, turn-the-other-cheek stuff. I like the kick-butt, take-no-prisoners appraoch popularized by the Spanish inquisitors. Now, they knew how to be tough!” To promote his new vision, Robertson has branched out from cable television into multimedia projects. He announced a new line of Christian-themed computer games, including:

    Commando for Christ: In this first-person shooter game, you are a warrior of God sent to rid the world of terrorists, sodomites, pagans, Latin American heads of state and other threats. Your goals are to kill off as many of these evildoers as possible and avoid getting killed yourself. Why are you acting surprised by this? Martyrdom is for sissies! Get out there and shoot!

    Sim Ministry: Build your own Christian media empire, just like Pat did. Start with a small congregation in the middle of nowhere and branch out into television and politics. But watch out for all the natural disasters and terrorist attacks that occur when God gets angry at the secularists running the world.

    Holy Hellfire: You are a fantasy role-playing gamer sent to Hell because of your love for Dungeons and Dragons and Harry Potter. (That’s witchcraft, dummy. Didn’t you read the Bible?) After you repent your sins, your goal is to escape Satan’s realm with your fellow sinners (including a goth, an astrologer, and an ACLU lawyer). You and your allies descend the different levels of Hell and face off against Satan during the final chapter of the game. You win the game by ascending to Paradise.

    Christian Civilization: Sort of akin to the best-selling “Civilization” strategy game, only this time you’re limited to playing America and Western Europe. Starting at 1 A.D., you build your civilization while fighting off pagans, Muslims, Aztecs and other non-Christians. You’ll also have to get rid of all of those sneaky Hebrews who want your money. The best part of all is that you get to conquer the Holy Land during the Crusades and keep it, thus preventing a lot of unpleasantness centuries later.

    Grand Theft Collection Plate: Forget all that Ten Commandments junk. This time, you get to play a sinner. You can be a hypocritical priest or a conniving congregant. Throw rocks at stained glass windows. Steal money from the collection plate. Get plastered drinking communion wine. Conduct a torrid love affair with the Sunday school teacher. The game is rated “M” for mature. This means no children playing, or Hillary Clinton will come after you.

    Comment by Raku — 26 August 2005 @ 9:55 AM


  2. “Christianity needs an image makeover,” Robertson continued. “No more of that simpering, turn-the-other-cheek stuff. I like the kick-butt, take-no-prisoners appraoch popularized by the Spanish inquisitors. Now, they knew how to be tough!”

    I can’t believe he actually cited the Spanish inquisitors as role models! Why is the FCC worried about Janet Jackson’s breast when this lunatic is still allowed to open his mouth on television?


    Commando for Christ: In this first-person shooter game, you are a warrior of God sent to rid the world of terrorists, sodomites, pagans, Latin American heads of state and other threats. Your goals are to kill off as many of these evildoers as possible and avoid getting killed yourself.

    Actually, that’s not as unrealistic as it sounds:

    In adventure game Timothy and Titus, from Australian startup White Knight Games, players assume the roles of the two disciples of St. Paul who spread the gospel throughout the ancient Mediterranean.

    Instead of the health and weapons points used in other role-playing games, players collect love, hope and faith points to power their missions. When they meet foes, instead of fragging them as in Halo 2, the disciples earn their halos by praying for them or using the “finger of God” to drive out evil spirits.

    Comment by Mike Godesky — 26 August 2005 @ 2:02 PM

  3. I can’t believe he actually cited the Spanish inquisitors as role models

    Good.

    ‘Cause he didn’t.

    That was a joke.

    Schedule your gullibility meter to be in the shop this weekend, you’re obviously past your 30,000 mile tune-up.

    Comment by Jason Godesky — 26 August 2005 @ 2:18 PM

  4. Easy, Smackdown Godesky! I was initially fooled by it as well. :)

    Comment by Raku — 26 August 2005 @ 3:55 PM


  5. ‘Cause he didn’t.

    That was a joke.

    Schedule your gullibility meter to be in the shop this weekend, you’re obviously past your 30,000 mile tune-up.

    Oooh…okay, good burn.

    But in my defense, it doesn’t take that much gullibility to think that’s an actual quote. We are talking about Pat Robertson here. He says crazy-ass shit like that all the time.

    Comment by Mike Godesky — 26 August 2005 @ 4:39 PM

  6. Point.

    (Apologies on that last one; came out much harsher than intended; meant only as a bit of ribald torment.)

    Comment by Jason Godesky — 26 August 2005 @ 4:45 PM

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Close
E-mail It