Comments on: Goodall’s Bananas http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/ se wo were fi na wosan kofa a yenki Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:37:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: The Anthropik Network » Noble or Savage? Both. (Part 1) http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-177252 The Anthropik Network » Noble or Savage? Both. (Part 1) Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:52:58 +0000 http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-177252 [...] “Goodall’s Bananas,” The Anthropik Network, 27 April 2007: [...] […] “Goodall’s Bananas,” The Anthropik Network, 27 April 2007: […]

]]> By: The Anthropik Network » Rewilding Humans http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-168811 The Anthropik Network » Rewilding Humans Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:45:39 +0000 http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-168811 [...] but this is largely due to a major error in Jane Goodall’s research method; see “Goodall’s Bananas“). Wolves, on the other hand, became the dominant predators on the planet precisely because [...] […] but this is largely due to a major error in Jane Goodall’s research method; see “Goodall’s Bananas“). Wolves, on the other hand, became the dominant predators on the planet precisely because […]

]]> By: Anonymous http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-99977 Anonymous Fri, 11 May 2007 20:25:22 +0000 http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-99977 Talk about civilizing - Cheeta has outlived Tarzan & is currently retired in Palm Springs: http://www.latimes.com/features/printedition/magazine/la-tm-cheeta16apr22,0,3519768.story?coll=la-home-headlines Talk about civilizing - Cheeta has outlived Tarzan & is currently retired in Palm Springs: http://www.latimes.com/features/printedition/magazine/la-tm-cheeta16apr22,0,3519768.story?coll=la-home-headlines

]]> By: How to Save the World http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-92845 How to Save the World Tue, 01 May 2007 22:30:01 +0000 http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-92845 <strong>Are We Violent By Nature?</strong> Are We Violent By Nature?

]]> By: Urban Scout http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-92106 Urban Scout Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:39:02 +0000 http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-92106 Go Bananas, GO, GO Bananas! Go Bananas, GO, GO Bananas!

]]> By: Giulianna Lamanna http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-91452 Giulianna Lamanna Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:02:28 +0000 http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-91452 This shit is bananas. B-A-N-A-N-A-S. Bananas. This shit is bananas.

B-A-N-A-N-A-S.

Bananas.

]]> By: Jason Godesky http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-90413 Jason Godesky Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:18:07 +0000 http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-90413 Sorry about the technical issues, Dan; sometimes Akismet gets all brownshirt on us. Sorry about the technical issues, Dan; sometimes Akismet gets all brownshirt on us.

]]> By: Dan http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-90357 Dan Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:11:05 +0000 http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-90357 The only source I can find now is <a href="http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11138&page=170" rel="nofollow">here</a>, but I included this study in <a href="http://danbartlett.co.uk/writings/hlksrz3.php" rel="nofollow">an essay/summary</a> I wrote a while back: "Rowell’s studies of African baboons (1967) in captivity and in the wild is particularly revealing: "<em>the rates at which certain behaviors occurred differed dramatically. Specifically, she found that rates of all social interactions were four times higher in captivity than in the wild, and that <b>rates of aggression were eight times higher in captivity</b></em>."" This links in well with all the Monkeysphere talk -- 4 x social interactions = 8 x violence. The only source I can find on this now is here - http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11138&page=170 The only source I can find now is here, but I included this study in an essay/summary I wrote a while back:

“Rowell’s studies of African baboons (1967) in captivity and in the wild is particularly revealing: “the rates at which certain behaviors occurred differed dramatically. Specifically, she found that rates of all social interactions were four times higher in captivity than in the wild, and that rates of aggression were eight times higher in captivity.”"

This links in well with all the Monkeysphere talk — 4 x social interactions = 8 x violence.

The only source I can find on this now is here - http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11138&page=170

]]> By: Jason Godesky http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-90214 Jason Godesky Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:06:29 +0000 http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-90214 <blockquote>I was just curious to know why you changed your outlook on this subject.</blockquote> Isn't it obvious? I learned something new!

I was just curious to know why you changed your outlook on this subject.

Isn’t it obvious? I learned something new!

]]> By: Andy http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-90211 Andy Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:01:03 +0000 http://anthropik.com/2007/04/goodalls-bananas/#comment-90211 I wasn't trying to invalidate Thesis #7 at all, I was just curious to know why you changed your outlook on this subject. Thanks for explaining yourself. And I agree that it actually makes your argument all the more strong. I wasn’t trying to invalidate Thesis #7 at all, I was just curious to know why you changed your outlook on this subject.

Thanks for explaining yourself. And I agree that it actually makes your argument all the more strong.

]]>